Fw: [HoE] Templar Bad Behavior?

["Meph & Kimberly" <Meph_and_Bunny@email.msn.com>]

>--}-----Original Message-----
>--}From: Sepulveda, Sam
>--}Sent: Monday, March 01, 1999 3:34 PM
>--}To: 'hoe@gamez.net'
>--}Subject: RE: [HoE] Templar Bad Behavior?
>--}
>--}
>--}--}>>         I think that the problem with this is that a
>--}--}Templar shouldn't
>--}--}really be
>--}--}>> running around with the bloodthirsty hindrance.  A
>--}--}Templar should have
>--}--}learned to
>--}--}>> control those impulses, and if he didn't, would he really
>--}--}have earned his
>--}--}sword?
>--}--}>> It might be a good idea to zap him this time, just as a
>--}--}warning that even
>--}--}>> bloodthirsty Templar aren't supposed to be quite that bad...
>--}
>--}
>--}
 I disagree completely.  I think many Templar's could have
bloodthristy or Grim Servant o' Death.  Just because the group is a
"righteous" group does not mean that everyone involved is
"righteous."  I
mean, the way Jo protrayed all the macho, sword toting male
Templars, we
have to get an image of less than Paladins.  They are not
your knights in
shining armor, they are more your those who wish to be heroic (for
glory/fame or honor, whatever the reason) and they all go
about that in many
different ways.  Look at Simon himself, he is not a shining
star of a man.
He forces himself on women for christ'sake!  I mean, that is
not a man that
leads honorable warriors, that is a glory hound who is out
to make a name
for himself.


Meph!

>