[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [HoE] Doomsayers & templars question for a campaign





Pat Gamblin wrote:

> <snip>
>
> >Do you people think this is too far fetched etc.  My other concern is
> >would the Templar still have his/her powers?  I am thinking that the
> >Doomsayer would still have powers, but I am not sure about the templar
> >though.  My posse doesn't know much about Hell On Earth at all.  I only
> >have the main book myself.  Although I have ordered the Wasted West,
> >Brainburners, COTA, and road warriors though.
> >
> >Feedback welcome and encouraged
>
> I'd say the Templar should still have his/her powers as it's mainly powered
> by the belief in some thing good (either the fallen heros [maybe not in
> this case, though, since they haven't fallen yet], themselves, the Templar
> ideal, et cetera). They might even just believe in doing good and they seem
> to get power.
>
> However, I'd say the Doomsayer would lose his/her powers, though. They get
> them from 'the Glow' I believe, and 'the Glow' doesn't exist back then (I
> assume they went back to the Wierd West era or something similar).
>
> Marshall Paddy
>
>

            I'd say that anything arcane from the future except junker devices
would be weaker.  Actually, Sykers may still be as strong, now that i think
about it.  Templar and Doomsayers shouldn't have as much access to their powers
though, maybe a maximum of 5 points of strain per day worth of use for
doomsayers and some equal restriction on Templar. (maybe all their rewards are
one or 2 levels lower)  After all, if all their powers are invested in them by
Simon, as suggested by the HOE book, then they would be as powerful before
Simon had even been born.  I agree that doomsayers may not have any powers at
all before the bombs, but it would be really cool to have a couple run into a
posse from the wierd west  :)

>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
>         unsubscribe hoe
> as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.