Re: [HoE] Last Crusaders

["Steven Nelson" <sdnelson@advancenet.net>]

Heck, for that matter name any religious or semi-religious organization that
is not like this.  Defending those they deem worthy, and keeping a monster
in the closet somewhere.  Aside from the Zen Lutherans (of which I am the
sole member) any other religious organization resembles this to some degree
(if not defines the standard...)

Just my 2 blasphemous cents.

Steven Nelson
sdnelson@advancenet.net



-----Original Message-----
From: DAMON SUTTON <d.sutton@lancaster.ac.uk>
To: hoe@gamerz.net <hoe@gamerz.net>
Date: Sunday, May 09, 1999 5:18 AM
Subject: [HoE] Last Crusaders


>Templars,
> Religious nuts out to make justice with a righteous leader and a
>Monster in the Boise closet.  They are plagued by a group of schismatics
>who want to overturn their leader for being a corrupt power monger.
>Granted great powers by the saints.
>
>Doomsayers
> Religious nuts out to make justice (for mutants) with a rightous
>leader and a Monster in the Las Vegas closet.  They are plagued by a
>group of schismatics who want to overturn the leader for being a corrupt
>power monger.  Granted great power through the actions of their saints.
>
> Was it just me, or were the layouts of the two groups really only
>differring in who was the good guys (the main or the heretics).  You
>could even argue that the main Templars defend only those they find
>worthy and that Rasmussen's group only defends those they find worthy
>(mutants) and the schismat groups both harrangue the main groups for
>being conditional in their defending of people.
>
>
>To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> unsubscribe hoe
>as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
>