Re: [HOE] Gamers Beware! A word of warning!!!

["James Smith" <andros@ameritech.net>]

I'm glad to see that a lot of you are taking this thread seriously...  I
just felt people needed to be aware of this possibility.  I started gaming
back in 84 when the threat against the industry was pretty hefty.  All in
all, we just need to stick together and watch each others' backs.

James in Dayton


----- Original Message -----
From: Darrin Bright <darrin@neobright.net>
To: <hoe@gamerz.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:26 PM
Subject: RE: [HOE] Gamers Beware! A word of warning!!!


> I don't think there's really any orginization for fighting against this.
The
> RPG industry just doesn't have the resources for it. Well, okay, there was
> kinda an organization, only it had just one member...
>
> Michael Stackpole.
>
> He's done the most work trying to get the straight facts out to people
about
> Pulling and the BADD crowd. Only he did this, what, 20 years ago? Since
> then, Pulling and BADD have pretty much faded out of the limelight (thank
> Luvia the Wuss-Gawd!), and Stackpole is much busy doing other stuff (like
> jerking around Battletech fanatics). RPG.Net has a good page full of
> resources on the Pulling Report:
>
> http://www.rpg.net/252/quellen/stackpole/pulling_report.html
>
> So if you're looking for information on how to organize against these
kinds
> of attacks, start there.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-hoe@gamerz.net [mailto:owner-hoe@gamerz.net]On Behalf Of
Scooter
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:02 PM
> To: hoe@gamerz.net
> Subject: RE: [HOE] Gamers Beware! A word of warning!!!
>
> Now I have to wonder. Is there a site or something for this? I want to hop
> on the wagon and join this fight, and I wonder if we can put together an
> organization to combat this threat, or if there are any really good groups
> already that one can join.
>
>
>
>
> Post your free ad now! Yahoo! Canada Personals
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> unsubscribe hoe@gamerz.net
> as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
>