Re: RE: [HOE] DnD movie, way [OT] was Junker Stuff

["Jamie Smith" <trogg_bl@ntlworld.com>]

Good example on why not to bring this up :)

I'll remember not to in any of my posts...

Thanks to all those who responded to my junker question.... but its by the
by now... slight accident with a couple of raptors and the rest of the posse
buggering off, still my junker lazer took one down before finishing me off
atleast <G> (10d10 AP10)

Just about to start a syker now pretty sure she's going to be a Star Swan

Jamie Smith

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Sulin" <grandmasternilus@hotmail.com>
To: <hoe@gamerz.net>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: RE: [HOE] DnD movie, way [OT] was Junker Stuff


> > > It's a little depressing to think that the crappiness of the D&D
> > > movie was *because* a gamer was in control.
> >
> >Yah, the general comment made around my circle of friends was that it was
a
> >great opportunity to legitimize the hobby by producing something that the
> >general public would appreciate - and the D&D Movie blew it.
> >
> >I think the only redeeming part of that movie was Zoe McLellan in her +1
> >stretch velvet.  :-)
>
> Hell yeah, I have to agree with that :)
>
> In a lot of circles though people associate Lord of the Rings with DnD
too.
> So the fact that those movies are good I think helps heal the wound that
is
> D&D: The Movie.
>
> All we can hope for is that if they ever make a Deadlands Movie,  It
doesn't
> suck.
>
> Dan
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> unsubscribe hoe@gamerz.net
> as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
>