RE: [HOE] Fightin' and Facin'

["Adam Gritt" <agritt@wi.rr.com>]

I would have to agree with that

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hoe@gamerz.net [mailto:owner-hoe@gamerz.net] On Behalf Of
Jason Young
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:22 PM
To: hoe@gamerz.net
Subject: Re: [HOE] Fightin' and Facin'


--- Randy Mosiondz <mosiondz@shaw.ca> wrote:
> In the Last Crusaders book it mentions that hand-to-hand attacks to
the
> rear
> 180 degree arc of a person causes that person to lose their weapon's
> defensive bonus against that attack.  In Waste Warriors it mentions
that
> hand-to-hand attacks from behind and surprises cause the defender to
> lose
> their Fightin' bonus to the attacker's TN.
> 
> Which of these are correct?  Or are both?  If the latter, it's REALLY
is
> deadly to for a brainer to be surrounded, even if he is a kung-fu
> master!

I don't have Waste Warriors, but I'd say they can't /both/ be true. A
good
fighter can still avoid rear attacks better than, well, than me, right?

How about:

Rear facing: no bonus for weapon (you're not holding them off with it)

Surprise: no bonus from Fighting or your weapon (you're a sitting duck)

???

That's off the top of my head, no warranty implied or explicit, yadda,
yadda.

Jason

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/


To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
	unsubscribe hoe@gamerz.net
as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.