[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pbmserv-dev] queued moves
- To: pbmserv-dev@gamerz.net
- Subject: [pbmserv-dev] queued moves
- From: Richard Rognlie <rrognlie@gamerz.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:40:38 -0400
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nowsp; d=gamerz.net; s=dk20040503;t=1127310038; h=Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:User-Agent; b=lhn1KRLlHtmyy5/mvA3hTFWjnHVD6GaIWc5Vzk/fxrgSQMGmwEDnRwlAexkP5iaB
- Reply-to: pbmserv-dev@gamerz.net
- Sender: owner-pbmserv-dev@gamerz.net
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
usability query for the assembled masses...
would it be better to make queuing a move a separate action from a
normal "move"?
mostly to prevent accidentally queuing a move when your mail server sends
the same move in twice... or something.
Yes, I'd make "queue" perform a move if it happens to be your move now
(say you get into a race condition of some sort where in the time it
takes you to compose and send your queue request... it became your turn)
Or is it not worth the effort?
--
/ \__ | Richard Rognlie / Sendmail Ninja / Gamerz.NET Lackey
\__/ \ | http://www.gamerz.net/~rrognlie <rrognlie at gamerz.net>
/ \__/ | Creator of pbmserv@gamerz.net
\__/ | Helping reduce world productivity since 1994