Re: [werewolf] email filtering

[Mark Hartwell <hartwell@copper.net>]

the ***** solution works pretty well, until a user usurps it (by 
deleting the *s but not some incriminating evidence.)

you can work all day long to make the server idiot proof, and we'll just 
keep working harder to make better idiots.

...hartwell


Lyman Hurd wrote:

> We need better filters to guard against inadvertent
> revelations!  And I don't mean Richard's signature
> file (although that too).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Lyman