Re: [BNW] BNW background

["Steve Crow" <crow_steve@hotmail.com>]

>>sure you dont NEED those numbers you can just make em up BUT BEWARE! your
>>BNW is now differnt from other BNW interpretations. if you have nice n
>>cuddly PCs this is all fine and dandy. However  if your PCs are anything
>>like mine your interpretation  will differ from thier interpretation and
>>this may not be noticed untill it is too late
>
>Just tell them that while the book may say X, you say 42, and that's the 
>way it is. I told you 42 long before you ever read X, so it's 42 since 
>we're playing my campagin. That's GM perogative. Don't let your players 
>steamroll you.
>

Just as an addendum to the comments above, if folks really feel this is a 
problem, might I suggest they have their players contact Matt Forbeck via 
e-mail (or phone him, if that works) and ask him which they should consider 
binding:  Matt's published comments on exact stats and ratios (assuming he 
ever does publish them), or what their Guide has ruled?

I suspect Matt's "official" answer to any such question they ask should be 
more than sufficient...

---

Steve Crow

"Worm Can Opener Extraordinare"

Check out my website at:  http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/4991/

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com