Re: [BNW] Go-go-gadget.....

["Ewan" <e.chilton@bcftcs.ac.uk>]

> >Err...surely that leaves a hole in the top, since your field will be
> >doughnut shaped.
> >
>
> Did that post get through?  Odd, I thought I deleted that line because the
> BNW makes it clear it is a "field", not a line (or a dome, which woudl
still
> presumably be more power-efficient than a half-sphere)?  So the whole
> perimeter thing, and reference therein, was not relevant.
>
> Apologies for the confusion.  I think I provided adequate other reasons
for
> why the issue in question wasn't relevant which involved***
>

no you mearly made up some new rules, ie. alphas are not affected by
nullifier fields

Ewan