Fate chips and rationalization WAS: [HOE] Massive Damage ...

[Theo McGuckin <tsm@jlab.org>]

>  >> Well I called my friend who was home (I started the
>  >> no-fate-chips-without-justification thread) and he couldn't find it
>  >> either. So I'm starting to suspect that I'm just a mean bastard of a
>  >> marshall and the rule does NOT in fact exist. I'll double check when I get
>  >> home just to make sure.
>  >
>  >Wait, no, I just remembered it was a guy at a con around here- Goff was
>  >having a sort of round-table discussion with some of us at the con.
> 
> I dunno if I was the one to mention it (then or now) but it's been a house 
> rule I've been using for awhile now.

Well I went home and hunted feverishly through all my tomes like a mad
scientist who's lost his favorite blueprint (I guess it would be more like
a junker who can't find his machine spirit) and I couldn't find any
mention of having to have an explaination when negating wounds with chips.
<sigh> I lose :(
At least it's good that I found out, my players should be happy.
And yes, I do pride myself on being one vicious SOB of a marshal :)

- Theo McGuckin, an obedient lackey licking the soft leather boot of High
Energy Particle Physics.