Re: [pbmserv-dev] Re: cathedral

[Eric Shultz <swift_4@yahoo.com>]

I've found that after a few games, the notation as it
is is fine.  It's not that hard to remember, and I
don't make directional mistakes any more.  I would say
to stick with the official notation.

Eric
swift
--- David GLAUDE PBEM <dglaude@gmx.net> wrote:
> > > 3. Positioning could be denoted by the left-most
> top-row
> > > corner of the piece. This would make it less
> prone to work
> > > out each pieces new 'focus' after rotations.
> >
> > I've implemented the notation as specified on the
> "official" site.
> 
> I have an alternative notation.
> Where you only specify what locations you are
> covering.
> That way you don't need to know direction and piece
> names...
> Just if you have the physical board and piece, list
> what you cover.
> 
> Does anybody else like that notation (of course it
> require more code to
> verify the move).
> 
> David GLAUDE
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net
> with
> 	unsubscribe pbmserv-dev
> as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/