'Twas 12:51 PM +0300 on Thursday 4/15/2004 when Ragnar Wikman IB wrote:
Hmm, people can have freak low scores as well - would it be possible to
use, say, 'average of top ten scores' or would that require too much new
programming/data storing?
That would require changing the way the high score data is stored. Cameron
is asking what he can do without major programming effort.
I think the proposed averaging would be A Bad Thing. In solitaire games
you always look at best scores.
Email doesn't really make sense for solitaire games unless there is a
tournament where everyone is facing the same random configuration. There
is something unsatisfying about playing a game of robots and not seeing the
robots marching to their doom.
--
RB |\ Randall Bart
aa |/ admin@RandallBart.com Home: 1-212-965-1786 Barticus@att.net
nr |\ Cell: 1-917-715-0831 I LOVE YOU Work: 1-212-343-1234 x3016
dt ||\ Not My Fault: http://shoah.brainthru.com/people/bystand.htm
a |/ Smart Greek Dude: http://aristarchus.brainthru.com
l |\ DOT-HS-808-065 The Church Of The Unauthorized Truth:
l |/ MS^7=6/28/107 http://yg.cotut.commailto:s@cotut.com