[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pbmserv-dev] scoring anomaly in Spades?
- To: pbmserv-dev@gamerz.net
- Subject: [pbmserv-dev] scoring anomaly in Spades?
- From: Lyman Hurd <lhurd@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 08:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
- Authentication-results: play.gamerz.net From=lhurd@yahoo.com; domainkeys=pass (testing)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=kbm1p6pXxjzT3MdoYeUwmbEt4rbKjf04vONPNLw/Izhz08pZilMKh7LvTfOr4g9BOZWjoN5huHlaxv4GGCUxJDwEWiwMN24zTu+vRICOIu2GNeP2YLcv5+MmsiP1RXUmiRoC/wZH0ZQoEkZPEY4csA+6yMRNP6bNNbR3UXdDUxQ= ;
- Reply-to: pbmserv-dev@gamerz.net
- Sender: owner-pbmserv-dev@gamerz.net
We may have found a scoring anomaly in Spades game
107. In this game my partner and I had bid 0 and 5
respectively. We made 1 and 4 (i.e., we both blew
it). When scoring we were penalized for the blown
"nil" but not the blown contract. Reading the rules
it looks as if the "1" earned by the nil player should
not do anything good! I.e., we should have been even
more humiliated :-).
Thoughts?
Lyman