[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pbmserv] Interesting ethical issue: perpetual check

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Lyman Hurd wrote:

Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:31:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Lyman Hurd <lhurd@yahoo.com>
To: pbmserv-users@gamerz.net
Subject: Re: [pbmserv] Interesting ethical issue: perpetual check

On the now theoretical issue, I would say that unless
the rules state to the contrary infinite check should
be a draw as there does not seem to be a reason to say
that someone must willingly put oneself in jeopardy.

Just my two cents.

Cheers,

Lyman

Agreed. That makes it four cents :-)

Ragnar

* Ragnar Wikman, Abo Akademi University  * "Every soul is  *
* Lecturer in Computer Science           *  worth a song." *
* mailto:rwikman@abo.fi                  *  -- Veikko Lavi *