Re: [PyrNet-L] Read and Weep

[Kelly Dunn Price <price@surgyinfosys.com>]

IMO, Although this particular piece may be romantic fiction as opposed to 
cold hard facts, it is very close to (and probably better than) the facts in 
many cases,  for many people it takes something to tug at their heartstrings 
to get them to think and hopefully act so although this is certainly not a 
flame, I do not agree that it is a waste of emotion. PETA and like groups 
can use this type of material just as easily as the real stories to do their 
business so I wouldn't consider it unnecessary fuel for their cause. Kelly
 ----------
From: pyrnet-l
To: pyrnet-l
Subject: Re: [PyrNet-L] Read and Weep
Date: Tuesday, March 03, 1998 02:39PM

In a message dated 98-03-03 13:24:15 EST, you write:

<< Save you
 outrage for real life puppy mills and backyard breeders who are out to make
 a buck, or volunteer some time to rescue--you will find plenty to be angry
 and upset about there.

 I have said my piece, flame suit on!
 Cathryn Lundberg >>

Cold hard information that is probably very valid.  The message is, keep the
romantic fiction in its place and separate it from the real world.  The key 
is
to know  which is which.

Joe