Re: [PyrNet-L] Duplicate kennel name

["adyment" <adyment@netcom.ca>]

Hi Everyone,

Since I am a  registered kennel with the C.K.C. does that  mean just no one
in Canada can use the Pyrview prefix, but can register that name with the
A.K.C. ???

Sandy Dyment
Pyrview Reg'd Great Pyrenees...
-----Original Message-----
From: JGentzel <JGentzel@aol.com>
To: pyrnet-l@gamerz.net <pyrnet-l@gamerz.net>
Date: March 5, 1998 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [PyrNet-L] Duplicate kennel name


>In a message dated 98-03-04 15:36:12 EST, you write:
>
><<  The only way to
> assure that you are the only person using a specific kennel name is to
> register it with the AKC. >>
>
>Good point Adrianne and even then the AKC does little to stop infractions
on
>use a name.  It is confusing thought, especially with those who compile
data
>bases etc.  Names are so important.  It can be terribly confusing for
example
>out kennel name since about 1973 has been Aneto.  Several years later we
>discovered there was a English breeder that was actually active for several
>years while we were breeding using the same name.  To this day people say
they
>saw our dogs in English stock.  Pyr Haven is another.  There was an old
West
>Coast Kennel with the name.  There is a contemporary one in Wisconsin that
has
>now been around about 30 years and to make things worse there is an English
>one as well.
>
>So a Adrianne has so gently suggested it is to your advantage to choose a
>kennel name, that as you have success breeding or whatever, you will not
get
>confused.  Remember the average stay of people in Pure Bred dogs is
something
>like 5 years.  So every 5 years everyone, essentially is new, and did not
know
>you before, etc.
>
>Joe
>