Re: [PyrNet-L] GPCA protest rebuttal

[Impyrial@aol.com]

In a message dated 3/18/1999 9:28:29 AM Eastern Standard Time,
adyment@netcom.ca writes:

<< So what we could be seeing is
 perhaps someone trying to make a few bucks on someones hard work and
 certainly pride in ones own kennel. >>
Hi Sandy,
I agree 100% that it is wrong for someone to take someone's kennel name to try
and make a few bucks on it...but this is not the case - and also not the issue
at hand.

<<Certainly its not up to a club to decide ownership of anything>>
This is exactly our point and the person was denied membership because of
ownership - I am glad you agree with me here.

<<however it is up to a club to decide if a person applying for membership is
in their opinion is a ethical and decent person>>
I also agree with this - who could consider anyone unethical for being
unwilling to give something up that they legally own just because someone else
wants it and when all the facts of the particular issue are not known?
Karen Justin
Impyrial pyrenees