Re: [PyrNet-L] GPCA protest rebuttal

[JGentzel@aol.com]

In a message dated 3/19/99 4:11:12 AM Eastern Standard Time,
timparks@pacbell.net writes:

<<  They 
 did not vote "on a issue of ownership" at all.  It was decided within the 
 rules of the club that her application would not be accepted.    There 
 was a failure to obtain two-thirds (2/3) of the vote to accept the
 applicant.   >>

What was the vote?  Would failure to vote against overturning a protest
constitute an affirmation of the protest and attach a position of ethics,
etc., that are being bantered around here? 

Joe