[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PyrNet-L] BREDDING:American verses French
In a message dated 4/28/99 5:59:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
bamb@monmouth.com writes:
<< They are entitled to their opinions also. Most good breeders
want to breed a dog that is structurally correct, with good
temperament and as few health problems as is humanly possible. Anyone
who is going to decide to breed should do their homework in these
areas. I'd rather see a Pyr that is coarse headed and with too much
bone than one who is elegant and lovely headed but with major
structural defects or health problems. >>
It is not really an either or proposition relative size and soundness.
Soundness is not just absence of genetic problems like dysplasia. It is
movement and structure confirmation more IMHO. While we have developed the
best moving pyrs in the world here in the North America we have lost size and
a lot of type. I think many of us agree that if you no longer have the type
or size, you may have crossed the line relative the attributes of the breed.
We have instead gone with large bone and heavy bodies as a substitute and
attempt to keep size. This at the expense of elegance. They are not the
same. There is a middle ground that the breeders who study and really
understand can work toward.
<<Sometimes they may look a little
different than what we may envision to be the "perfect" Pyrenees but
to each breeder the interpretation of the standard may be a little
different than what ours may be. You know what you like, I know what I
like and someone else knows what they like.>>
Without meaning to be critical at all of your comments, I believe this is at
the core of the problem. Many do know what they like and it is not
necessarily Pyrenean in nature. Many have no clue what is correct to begin
with. Look at the old pictures of Estat and his brother Estagel. Look at any
picture of a "de Soum" dog and you know this is the type that is the Great
Pyrenees. Look at the head. Is it flat on top? Are the supraorbital ridges
apparent? Is there a furrow between the eyes? Do the eyes droop or are they
round? Do the ears sit above the level of the eyes? Does the skin from the
upper jaw hang below the lower jaw? The stop or too much of it is a result
of the above traits i.e. is these are correct chances are there will be no
apparent stop as the standard prescribes. These are the primary problems I
see in type both here and abroad, but much more common here. Almost to the
point that it is accepted in many quarters as correct.
Joe