[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pyrnet] Ch Pyr Sire x Ch Pyr Dam = BOXER!

To: pyrnet-l@pyrnet.org
Subject: Re: [pyrnet] Ch Pyr Sire x Ch Pyr Dam = BOXER!
From: Lnor4@aol.com
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 19:54:02 EDT
Reply-To: pyrnet-l@pyrnet.org
Sender: owner-pyrnet-l@pyrnet.org

Linda-
On a recent e-mail to AKA, they actually tell me that, "even though I have
the correct #'s for the parents, the WR shows it's a boxer". (Signed "Kathy
Hairston @ K1H@akc.org.)
Like I perviously said, I'm not worried, but after reading your e-mail, I am
really confused!
Linda In AZ

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pyrnet] Ch Pyr Sire x Ch Pyr Dam = BOXER!
  - From: "Linda Weisser" <lmweisser@home.com>
- Re: [pyrnet] Ch Pyr Sire x Ch Pyr Dam = BOXER!
  - From: "Linda Weisser" <lmweisser@home.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [pyrnet] Ch Pyr Sire x Ch Pyr Dam = BOXER!
Next by Date: Re: [pyrnet] Ch Pyr Sire x Ch Pyr Dam = BOXER!
Prev by thread: Re: [pyrnet] Ch Pyr Sire x Ch Pyr Dam = BOXER!
Next by thread: Re: [pyrnet] Ch Pyr Sire x Ch Pyr Dam = BOXER!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread