[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pyrnet] Signs on gates..

To: pyrnet-l@pyrnet.org
Subject: Re: [pyrnet] Signs on gates..
From: "Judith Stroh Miller" <jsmiller@newmex.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:33:05 -0700
In-reply-to: <002f01c528ca$43893ee0$1901a8c0@gulftel.com>
Priority: normal
Reply-to: pyrnet-l@pyrnet.org
Sender: owner-pyrnet-l@pyrnet.org

On 14 Mar 2005 at 13:16, Ghost Rider wrote:

> If you have a sign that says "Beware.." about a dog or a sign that
> says "Attack dog on duty" OR "Guard dog on Duty" or something to that
> effect...
>             AND...
> someone comes on your property and gets hurt, by having those signs
> you are as much as admitting that you knew the dog was "vicious."

We all need to check our local state and county ordinance regarding 
what kind of signage can be used and assumed liability.  Each state and 
county  have different interpretations.

Judith
Taos, New Mexico
jsmiller@newmex.com
http://home.earthlink.net/~ksane/judy/

References:
- [pyrnet] Signs on gates..
  - From: "Ghost Rider" <kaiser4@gulftel.com>

Prev by Date: [pyrnet] Signs on gates..
Next by Date: Re: [pyrnet] Re: Moving to a new home
Previous by thread: [pyrnet] Signs on gates..
Next by thread: Re: [pyrnet] Re: Moving to a new home
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread