Re: Re[2]: [WW] Firing main guns (vehicle weapons) at PCs or NPCs

["richard spangle" <lost_rich@hotmail.com>]

>From: Arne Reuter <reuter@tse-online.de>
>
>I'd still add them, since tanks lack the integral agility of a
>creature (even a colossal one). Especially the WWII tanks were very
>clumsy to operate and could not react very fast. Add to that, that
>the tank crew would have a very narrow field of vision while buttoned
>up, you have ample opportunity to add modifiers.
------------------>
i would not add their dex considering they are basically still running a 
baseline, but i would require that the armor personnel have init over the 
target's and remember to take into account concealment rules.

>They have a hard time hitting a person standing still on an empty
>field directly. That person still might be torn apart by blast and
>shrapnel of a near miss, though.
--------------->
hay, in artillery a near miss is as good as a hit some times. too many 
target's i've seen damaged by flying debris. your tanker shooting at a 
person also needs to remember the rules for prone (-4) and sitting/kneeling 
(-2) defenders. prone, sitting & kneeling usually have some form of 
cover/concealment in their favor.




...the rich
"the ninja's failed and failure is unacceptable. if they ever show their 
faces you know what to do."
"yes, tell them to wash with a loofah sponge."
         --------->can you name this movie?


_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com