Re: [werewolf] deadlock

[Lyman Hurd <lhurd@yahoo.com>]

Yes, you have a good point.  However I think it
represents a hole in the rules (ties go to WW's) which
wasn't patched when the illusionist was introduced. 
Should be if (WW + I) == GG then WW win...

And yes (though I won't be believed) I think that is
the way it should be even when I am not furry :-). 

I think there should be a way in general to have night
come if a deadlock is irreconcilable.  The question is
what determines an unbreakable deadlock?

Lyman

--- Richard Rognlie <rrognlie@gamerz.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:32:56PM -0700, Lyman Hurd
> wrote:
> > Game 99 is about to deadlock (2 wolves +
> illusionist
> > vs 3 good guys).  Did we ever institute a
> resolution
> > to this situation or is this going to be the game
> that
> > never ends?
> 
> Even if gia had not self destructed, the game was
> not going to
> end in a deadlock.
> 
> Neither of the 2 players with 2 votes were furry.
> 
> once milla voted for someone, the remaining voter
> (furry) would
> go along with it (even if it was for the
> illusionist, potentially,
> since i don't know who the illusionist is)
> 
> then, in the night, the furries just needed to
> succeed in getting a
> victim and then would win in the morning 2 on 2.
> 
> -- 
>  /  \__  | Richard Rognlie / Sendmail Ninja /
> Gamerz.NET Lackey
>  \__/  \ | http://www.gamerz.net/~rrognlie   
> <rrognlie at gamerz.net>
>  /  \__/ |      I didn't say it was your fault,
>  \__/    |      I only said I was going to blame you
> for it
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net
> with
> 	unsubscribe werewolf-users@gamerz.net
> as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
> 
>