Re: [werewolf] werewolfbite game #2

[Lyman Hurd <lhurd@yahoo.com>]

Count me in too.

I would tend to say that angelic protection does
extend to bites.

Although I am tempted to say that the WW's then lose
their chance, that may be too severe.

Cheers,

Lyman

--- mike ledoux <mwl+gamerz@volta.dyndns.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:42:58PM -0700, Mark
> Ballinger wrote:
> > I'm ready to call the testing game werewolfbite #2
> dead.  I'll be
> > rolling out another big-ass change and want to
> test it, so I'll
> > start wwb#3 when it's ready.
> 
> Ok, count me in.
> 
> > Among the issues close to being resolved.  Are we
> in agreement
> > that the bite percentages should be dropped in
> favor of a
> > strategic allocation of x number of bites
> available during the
> > game?  And that the bite can be used against
> anybody, who then
> > loses his power and joins the bad guys?
> 
> Sounds good to me.  Question: will angel protection
> work against
> bite with this change?  If so, will the failed bite
> count against
> x or not?
> 
> -- 
> mwl@alumni.unh.edu                 OpenPGP KeyID
> 0x57C3430B
> Holder of Past Knowledge           CS, O-
> Put your wasted CPU cycles to use:
> http://www.distributed.net/
> Don't care if you're rich or not, as long as you can
> live
>  comfortably and have everything you want.
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net
> with
> 	unsubscribe werewolf-users@gamerz.net
> as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.
> 
>