[HoE] Anti_templars and templars

["Scott Henry" <scott_henry@hotmail.com>]

No I just dont like it when Gms have to add some new rule casue they cant 
think of a roleplaying way to do something. Of course they have to make 
scrait checks and all. <br><br>
And my way has been done before with much greater effect. Sides it sounds 
like your gonna make erm roll ethier way and they will bitch a lot more if 
they know your forcing them too. Actually forget the damn die rolling 
ROLL-PLAYING crap ok? <br><br>
What a good gm would do is forget using some die roll as a crutch to get the 
AT to go evil and just make some purely roleplaying situation or if he never 
uses his powers from the reconkers so what? WAH. Just who do you think the 
baddies are gonna go after in the big fights huh? They are gonna go after 
the damn munchin AT who is showing off his powers. Also a AT who doesnt go 
evil would have enimes on both sides, He has the evil AT's coming after him, 
The Templars after him, Settlers dont trust him and will probably try and 
kill him or turn him in, basically no one will trust him and his normal 
allies will try and kill him once they realise he is one of those "good" 
ATs. And you dont have to really on some  "temptation" die roll. My idea of 
the "subconcious" thing was crap I admit and I would actually never use that 
idea.


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com