[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pbmserv] Interesting ethical issue: perpetual check

To: Ezequiel Martín Cámara<ezequiel.martin.camara@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [pbmserv] Interesting ethical issue: perpetual check
From: "Gregory A. Swarthout" <gregorys@xmission.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:17:49 -0700
Cc: pbmserv-users@gamerz.net
In-reply-to: <607865d30602211501i5bded578q2e2609cb78c48c71@mail.gmail.com>
References: <607865d30602211501i5bded578q2e2609cb78c48c71@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: owner-pbmserv-users@gamerz.net
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)

Ezequiel Martín Cámara wrote:

Hello fellow PBeMers.

In this terrace game 149, I am in a hopeless situation, with a sure
loss in two moves. But...

But I also have my opponent's key piece locked in such a way that I
can perpetually attack it and avoid the loss for as long as I want.


Actually, I responded in my last move that I have devised a way out
of perpetual check, rendering the instant issue moot.

Greg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pbmserv] Interesting ethical issue: perpetual check
  - From: Lyman Hurd <lhurd@yahoo.com>

References:
- [pbmserv] Interesting ethical issue: perpetual check
  - From: "Ezequiel Martín Cámara" <ezequiel.martin.camara@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [pbmserv] Interesting ethical issue: perpetual check
Next by Date: Re: [pbmserv] Interesting ethical issue: perpetual check
Previous by thread: [pbmserv] Interesting ethical issue: perpetual check
Next by thread: Re: [pbmserv] Interesting ethical issue: perpetual check
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread