Theoretically its a draw, but who uses
this strategy has already lost.
Chess is a game of mind. There is no
grace if you do perpetual check. If you are a good player, it shouldnÂt
have come to this situation. Otherwise accept the defeat.
I agree. Forcing a draw is a viable strategic option
in Chess.
On 2/22/06, Lyman Hurd <lhurd@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On the now theoretical issue, I would say that unless
the rules state to the contrary infinite check should
be a draw as there does not seem to be a reason to say
that someone must willingly put oneself in jeopardy.
> Ezequiel Martïn Cïmara wrote:
> > Hello fellow PBeMers.
> >
> > In this terrace game 149, I am in a hopeless
> situation, with a sure
> > loss in two moves. But...
> >
> > But I also have my opponent's key piece locked in
> such a way that I
> > can perpetually attack it and avoid the loss for
> as long as I want.
>
> Actually, I responded in my last move that I have
> devised a way out
> of perpetual check, rendering the instant issue
> moot.
>
> Greg
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net
> with
> unsubscribe pbmserv-users@gamerz.net
> as the BODY of the message. The SUBJECT is ignored.
>
>
Diese E-Mail enthaelt vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.