Re: [PyrNet-L] Re: Size

["Janice Swenson" <janices@jump.net>]

> In a message dated 5/7/99 4:09:28 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
> Steven.K.Slusser@osfhealthcare.org writes:
> <<  I guess from here
>       we need to define immense vs giant vs large vs ...  Thus, I guess
>       that's why the "standard" has objective measures, 27 to 32 inches for
>       males etc. yadda yadda yadda
>  
>       That's enough from my little corner of the peanut gallery. 
>>
On 8 May 99, at 10:08, JGentzel@aol.com wrote:
> Its probably just semantics and so subjective to not be worth the debate.  
> Giant, massive, immense or whatever the breed should be large.

Another corner of the peanut gallery.  The standard also says a 
dog of medium substance.  That's what I have pyrs of medium 
substance within the height specification in the standard.  They 
aren't my newfoundlands and should not have the bone of a 
newfoundland, which is a breed of considerable substance.  If you 
really want larger pyrs then lobby to change the standard.  

Janice, janices@jump.net
Admiral & Linsey (newfs), Bianca & Sonny (pyrs)  
http://www.jump.net/~janices/
Leander, TX
Visit Old West Newfoundland Club's website at  
http://www.jump.net/~janices/ownc/