[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [WW] PBEM - Call for discussion

To: weirdwars@gamerz.net
Subject: Re: [WW] PBEM - Call for discussion
From: lizard <lizard@mrlizard.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 16:25:47 -0700
References: <2352151078.998784563@[10\.16\.70\.178]> <2352151078.998784563@[10.16.70.178]> <5.1.0.14.2.20010905170417.04aecea8@pop.nmia.com>
Reply-To: weirdwars@gamerz.net
Sender: owner-weirdwars@gamerz.net


> What do the members of the listserv think about PBEMs on the lists?  Like I
> said, I personally think that they are okay, but I worry that there may
> come a point where the PBEM posts drown out the discussion posts.
> 
I dislike them. Please, form a seperate list for PBEM. I don't want a
lot of very long text files clogging my inbox and bandwidth when what
I'm interested in is discussion of game mechanics, errata, cool ideas,
and so on.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [WW] PBEM - Call for discussion
  - From: "Ole Ingvar Stene" <oleingva@ifi.ntnu.no>

References:
- [WW] PBEM - Call for discussion
  - From: "Allan 'Deputy' Seyberth" <moderator@darious.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [WW] PBEM - Call for discussion
Next by Date: Re: [WW] PBEM - Call for discussion
Prev by thread: [WW] PBEM - Call for discussion
Next by thread: Re: [WW] PBEM - Call for discussion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread