[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [werewolf] Angel protection
- To: werewolf-users@gamerz.net
- Subject: Re: [werewolf] Angel protection
- From: Lyman Hurd <lhurd@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
- Authentication-results: play.gamerz.net header.From=lhurd@yahoo.com; domainkeys=pass
- Authentication-results: sentrion.gamerz.net header.From=lhurd@yahoo.com; domainkeys=pass
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=5liVJeZJvxnQ+1550CtkOE8Mqgqx5cxJ9Y+y83VqxG9WIA9X6qCegNZkuVm5b77Yr7Nl9hJ6gm9d33CstCMtwaDOzTQMalY76seSk78x1NOjIuvfI+KV8NIbi1gCepkL1K6IicoDYrBf1bA/yRbkDB6WOvP4LCw3VW+YHbdibTE= ;
- In-reply-to: <e5d860680509180906941ec86@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lhurd@yahoo.com
- Sender: owner-werewolf-users@gamerz.net
It is not gmail, it is the way this list is set up
apparently. I always have to remember to do a "reply
to all" instead of a "reply".
Cheers,
Lyman
--- Gregory Krohne <krohne@gmail.com> wrote:
> GMail keeps doing that to me. Or, is it the listbot?
> I just hit reply,
> and it goes to the original sender, instead of the
> list. I have to
> change the 'To:' line if I want it to go to the
> list.
>
> > On 9/18/05, Joe Christensen <jchristensen@mcm.edu>
> wrote:
> > > Gregory - You sent your reply to me personally,
> not to the list. (I'll
> > > let you forward it to the list if that's what
> you meant.) On could
> > > argue that the medic's protect command is their
> attempt to follow the
> > > individual and after the shooting, arrives on
> the scene in time to keep
> > > ther person from dying. - Joe
> > >
> > > Gregory Krohne wrote:
> > >
> > > >On 9/18/05, Joe Christensen
> <jchristensen@mcm.edu> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> mike ledoux wrote:
> > > >> On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 01:13:45PM -0700,
> Mark Ballinger wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Next question. Should angelic protection save
> a villager from bite?
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes.
> > > >>
> > > >> That is, the angel should protect a villager
> against a bite. I
> > > >>would say that the medic should /not/ protect
> a villager from being
> > > >>recruited by the mob, though.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Are you basing this on logic? Doesn't make
> sense? Maybe the medic has
> > > >>anti-crime vaccine. (Truth serum?)
> > > >> It would make more sense for police to
> protect against mafia-bite, but that
> > > >>doesn't fit the game.
> > > >> I think the roles should be symmetric...
> maybe we need a new name for the
> > > >>mafia version of angel. (vigilante?)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >'Medic' is probably the wrong term for what the
> mafia protector does,
> > > >since the medic doesn't conceptually protect
> the victim from attack as
> > > >the angel does. Perhaps, the 'medic' should be
> called 'bodyguard',
> > > >'G-man', or 'protective custody'.
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net
> with
> unsubscribe werewolf-users@gamerz.net
> as the BODY of the message. The SUBJECT is ignored.
>
>