[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [HoE] Accumulated Rulings, was: [HOPLER] Veteran Hucksters vs. HoE Hucksters

To: hoe@gamerz.net
Subject: Re: [HoE] Accumulated Rulings, was: [HOPLER] Veteran Hucksters vs. HoE Hucksters
From: The Baron Samedi <baron11@netmcr.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 21:34:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19990629153735.007e1cc0@pop.nmia.com>
References: <19990629192303.78637.qmail@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: hoe@gamerz.net
Sender: owner-hoe@gamerz.net


>
>
>Well, it's about time for me to update the AR, seeing as how it hasn't been
>done since April.  Of course, there was 7 posts worth putting in during
>April and May, and 17 in june....
>
>Still don't remember what the Milrat explanation was either though...
>-------------------
>Allan Seyberth
>darious@darious.com

can I recommend a new "new rulings" section for those who irregularly check 
it, or list of categories with new rulings?

TBS

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [HoE] Accumulated Rulings, was: [HOPLER] Veteran Hucksters vs. HoE Hucksters
  - From: Allan Seyberth <darious@darious.com>

References:
- [HoE] Re: [HOPLER] Veteran Hucksters vs. HoE Hucksters
  - From: Steve Crow <crow_steve@hotmail.com>
- [HoE] Accumulated Rulings, was: [HOPLER] Veteran Hucksters vs. HoE Hucksters
  - From: Allan Seyberth <darious@darious.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [HoE] Re: [HOPLER] Veteran Hucksters vs. HoE Hucksters
Next by Date: Re: [HoE] Accumulated Rulings, was: [HOPLER] Veteran Hucksters vs. HoE Hucksters
Prev by thread: [HoE] Accumulated Rulings, was: [HOPLER] Veteran Hucksters vs. HoE Hucksters
Next by thread: Re: [HoE] Accumulated Rulings, was: [HOPLER] Veteran Hucksters vs. HoE Hucksters
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread