[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [werewolf] Game 113 stalemate



Last time there was a stalemate, I was the angel and gave it to the bad guys. This time I'm a wolf, and I ain't movin'.

Shanna (altaira)

On Aug 17, 2004, at 2:42 PM, Lyman Hurd wrote:

I would say always favor the bad guys.

1) If day is a stalemate, night would have come...
Hard to argue with them fangs.

2) It sems that it is a legitimate goal of the baddies
to foment fear, uncertainty and doubt.  If the village
can't get their acts together, they get what they
deserve!

That being said, do we have other reason to suspect
that the game may be getting unbalanced in favor of
the forces of evil?

Lyman

--- Ted Rathkopf <ted-pbmserv-lists@rathkopf.net>
wrote:

Meanwhile, back at the model home, Kevin Sonney
<ksonney@gmail.com> said:

With a stalemate in game 113, I'd like once again
to reccomend some
sort of time limit algorithm. In this case, were
this the real world,
the sun would eventually set, and the wolves would
eventually kill
someone, ending the stalemate. The logic would
have to recognize the
following, I think :

Let's just make this simple. If all the bad guys are voting for one person, and all the good guys are voting for another person, and the number of votes is the same for each faction, then the game is over.

I would say let's make this one go to the villagers,
not the bad guys,
since the wolves already get the advantage if they
have the same
number as innocents.  Let's toss this one to the
good guys.

--
Ted Rathkopf


To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with unsubscribe werewolf-users@gamerz.net as the BODY of the message. The SUBJECT is ignored.




To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
	unsubscribe werewolf-users@gamerz.net
as the BODY of the message.  The SUBJECT is ignored.