[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [werewolf] Turn numbering & such
- To: werewolf-users@gamerz.net
- Subject: Re: [werewolf] Turn numbering & such
- From: Lee Griffin <leegriffin@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:20:01 -0400
- Authentication-results: play.gamerz.net header.from=leegriffin@gmail.com; domainkeys=pass
- Authentication-results: sentrion.gamerz.net header.from=leegriffin@gmail.com; domainkeys=pass
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tnglRdyVIsIQ5ldvJvLsaFbpk+0knmJ5XFFWbWvSYzrMqptvSCA344oRpxgdBoE0KcFNNFzwuIa/SEJMkMQNH7jr7qPPP1ZfROojfIfOsR7dalrX0P550jIml0O/0GI+lyMPDMImSObfdIA/0/ET1NM5NrMi9Uby6qqZsU91Ztk=
- In-reply-to: <432ADFCC.5060902@gmail.com>
- References: <432ADFCC.5060902@gmail.com>
- Reply-to: leegriffin@gmail.com
- Sender: owner-werewolf-users@gamerz.net
All valid points. The only thing I'm thinking about is if the counter
reset after each turn, it may become more difficult for proper
refrencing of prior events.
Example: Say I'm a mason. It's turn 4. I have to deal with c04.003,
m04.010 and whatever else is thrown out. After awhile, the "prefix"
letter will be lost to the eyes. By keeping a running tally of all
messages sent, it just seems easier (IMO).
Just to clarify, I'm not against the letter prefix, just the message
count reset each turn.
On 9/16/05, Ian Cyr <toreigninhell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, wasn't the whole point of numbering the messages to help those
> using g-mail and other assorted similar facilities?
>
> I'd vote for numbering most of the messages sent. I had offered up the
> suggestion a while back of doing h1.x, c1.x, s1.x, m1.x etc. for howls,
> contract, seer, mason respectively. Those I think we could do
> throughout the entire game without numbering them each turn... just a
> running counter for each. Kills, info, disguise don't need to be
> numbered, I don't think, although kills could be numbered in with the
> howls/contracts I guess, if we're doing votes in with chats.
>
> As for the chats, I was just asking re: turn.total or turn.totalinturn.
> It makes no difference to me, but it might be easier to reference a
> single message in that turn. Or not. I like to keep things well
> organized like that, so it's just me.
>
> Lee Griffin wrote:
>
> > The message numbering is cool as is (turn/total). I may be in the
> > minority, but I don't see the value in numbering each message sent in
> > a turn per type. Also, I don't see the need for numbering the "secret"
> > messages, even though it does would it a pain in gmail for those few
> > roles. But that's by two cents.
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> > unsubscribe werewolf-users@gamerz.net
> > as the BODY of the message. The SUBJECT is ignored.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to esquire@gamerz.net with
> unsubscribe werewolf-users@gamerz.net
> as the BODY of the message. The SUBJECT is ignored.
>
>